Perth-WRX.com  

Go Back   Perth-WRX.com > Technical > Mechanicals
Register Diddy Kart ArticlesAll AlbumsBlogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Welcome to Perth-WRX, click here to register!

View Poll Results: Cold air intake? or no cold air intake?
CAI 14 70.00%
No CAI 6 30.00%
Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 22-02-2009, 07:15 PM
tropikal's Avatar
Sir AntiLag
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: perth
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
tropikal at standard level
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daaaamien
That's what i would have thought, because the turbo would be around the same temp as the exhaust rite?
Hrmm i wouldn't think so but i may be wrong..
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 22-02-2009, 09:32 PM
phizzle's Avatar
Powered by BP98
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Perth
Posts: 3,284
Thanks: 43
Thanked 38 Times in 30 Posts
phizzle at standard level
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daaaamien
I'm talking about having your pod inside the guard tho.
So there is more piping bends ect.
The lag will come from AFTER the turbo has compressed the charge of air. The length of your intercooler pipework is what affects lag. By the way lag is the time taken for the turbo to spool to full boost after the point at which full boost is achieved from idle (known as the boost threshold). So if your turbo makes full boost by 3600rpm (threshold) and you are cruising at 5000rpm (no throttle, coasting, 0psi) and nail the accelerator to the floor, the time it takes from that point for the turbo to reach full boost again is lag.

By using a CAI in-gaurd kit you are effectively no longer taking air from the engine bay (and the associated heat). By starting with a lower intake temp a certain percentage, the end result is that when that same air enters the combustion chamber, it will also be a certain percentage cooler. Remembering that cooler air is denser = there is more air to be used in the combustion process which means you have to add more fuel to keep the mixture at the correct ratio = drum roll................

More powahhhhhhhhhh. I hope all that makes sense
__________________
No more GC8, sad face.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 22-02-2009, 10:36 PM
Daaaamien's Avatar
WRX Hi Five Club
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Henley Brook
Posts: 261
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Daaaamien at standard level
Default

thanks for the feedback.

and yea i know the colder the air the more percentage of oxygen in it so the hotter it burns, therefore more power

But the question still stands...

If someone has actually had both and if an extra $300-$400 for a pipe will be worth it...

Quote:
Originally Posted by phizzle
The lag will come from AFTER the turbo has compressed the charge of air. The length of your intercooler pipework is what affects lag. By the way lag is the time taken for the turbo to spool to full boost after the point at which full boost is achieved from idle (known as the boost threshold). So if your turbo makes full boost by 3600rpm (threshold) and you are cruising at 5000rpm (no throttle, coasting, 0psi) and nail the accelerator to the floor, the time it takes from that point for the turbo to reach full boost again is lag.

By using a CAI in-gaurd kit you are effectively no longer taking air from the engine bay (and the associated heat). By starting with a lower intake temp a certain percentage, the end result is that when that same air enters the combustion chamber, it will also be a certain percentage cooler. Remembering that cooler air is denser = there is more air to be used in the combustion process which means you have to add more fuel to keep the mixture at the correct ratio = drum roll................

More powahhhhhhhhhh. I hope all that makes sense
__________________
Winning the award for slowest build in history.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 22-02-2009, 11:18 PM
phizzle's Avatar
Powered by BP98
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Perth
Posts: 3,284
Thanks: 43
Thanked 38 Times in 30 Posts
phizzle at standard level
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daaaamien
But the question still stands...

If someone has actually had both and if an extra $300-$400 for a pipe will be worth it...
Putting a pipe that will blow cold air into the vicinity of a pod filter already in your engine bay for $300 or $400 would certainly not be good bang for buck. However having a piece of pipe that will join onto your AFM, go through the gaurd wall and down into the front of the wheel arch area, then stick the pod on that (which is what I'm guessing you mean) would be much better and produce better results.
Having said that, I wouldn't expect it to be like "wow what a difference" as far as the bumn dyno goes. It will make a pretty good induction noise though and as it appeals to my inner ricer I say go for it!! Any decent exhaust workshop could rig one up for you for less than $300 though, including a bracket on the pod end to secure it real nice. It would just be a matter of getting a nice seal onto the AFM side as your pod filter should already have an adapter and O clamp type set up.
__________________
No more GC8, sad face.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 22-02-2009, 11:20 PM
DCCD Donut Driver
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Koondoola
Posts: 123
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
q2cmy00 at standard level
Default

i dont think there are huge power gains, and the money could be put towards a mod that will make a difference. do it if you want piece of mind that the engine is getting a little colder air. without knowing what mods you do have, i would say make sure you have an exhaust before the cai, and possibly a bigger tmic/fmic and bigger turbo. they are mods you will see gains from
__________________
electrical work needed? 0438954622
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 22-02-2009, 11:30 PM
Daaaamien's Avatar
WRX Hi Five Club
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Henley Brook
Posts: 261
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Daaaamien at standard level
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phizzle
However having a piece of pipe that will join onto your AFM
Yes thats a CAI isnt it? unless there a different types...

ok so there is not much of a performance gain if im only running a stock turbo and intercooler?
__________________
Winning the award for slowest build in history.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 22-02-2009, 11:52 PM
Pimpreza's Avatar
Flat Four Father
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Slums of Warnbro.
Posts: 2,122
Thanks: 4
Thanked 32 Times in 31 Posts
Pimpreza at standard level
Default

You are better off using the standard air box with a good panel filter & having piping going from your lower inner guard to the air box.........provided you don't have front mount as the piping usually gets in the way.

You also need to be careful of getting your pod wet if it's in guard & it's a pain to remove or clean.

Also looks more stock & you can make it out of 90mm PVC for less than $20, I've had mine in for 3yrs without a problem & it has really good induction noise.

__________________
Beaten up old 98 Gen 2 Liberty, 13.0, stock V3 STI running gear.
07 Transit motor home
69 VF & 70 VG Valiants needing full restoration
Yamaha Zooma 50cc rocket hopefully going with the Transit.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 23-02-2009, 12:12 AM
Adz's Avatar
Adz Adz is offline
STI Master
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Corimbia
Posts: 953
Thanks: 2
Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
Adz at standard level
Default

Polarbear Bunnings-spec garbage bin is the ONLY way to go

__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Last edited by Adz; 23-02-2009 at 12:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 23-02-2009, 08:03 AM
WRX Hi Five Club
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Perth
Posts: 202
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
deviant at standard level
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daaaamien
$300-$400


Thats an awfull expensive way to gain a whopping 1BHP and a bit of extra noise.

Unless you are removing restrictions further on in the system it would be better to save your money and investigate other bolt on tweaks first.

In fact you are going to see better results spending that $400 on new plug leads, spark plugs, injector clean and a tank of 98 RON.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 23-02-2009, 08:19 AM
tuna's Avatar
Sign me up!
Why stop at two bar?
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Where horsepower is cool again.
Posts: 5,570
Blog Entries: 5
Thanks: 7
Thanked 107 Times in 50 Posts
tuna is a gurutuna is a guru
Default

i wouldnt bother with a CAI, they make near as no difference once the car is in motion.
__________________

Long live the WRC
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
bay, cai, engine


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Welcome to Perth-WRX, click here to register!

All times are GMT +8. The time now is 01:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO