Perth-WRX.com  

Go Back   Perth-WRX.com > Technical > Mechanicals
Register Diddy Kart ArticlesAll AlbumsBlogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Welcome to Perth-WRX, click here to register!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-07-2006, 05:55 PM
tuna's Avatar
Sign me up!
Why stop at two bar?
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Where horsepower is cool again.
Posts: 5,570
Blog Entries: 5
Thanks: 7
Thanked 107 Times in 50 Posts
tuna is a gurutuna is a guru
Default

so its safe to assume all GC rally cars run a R180 4.11 diff? odd- as ive not heard of such a combination.

the only diffs available in an R180 were 4.444 for the GC8, and only recently 3.9 ratio with the 02 onwards 6 speeds.

if this is a comparison of a 4.444 standard R160 crown in a normal subaru, yes they are cheap and weak. as opposed to a homoligated 4.444 R180 crown, they are a different story again.

i doubt most rally teams given a finite budget would risk a rally using R160 4.11 diffs and standard r160 axles.
__________________

Long live the WRC
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-07-2006, 05:57 PM
maddog's Avatar
STI Master
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 771
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
maddog at standard level
Default

Guys get off the web and actually speak to some people who use the stuff.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tuna
so its safe to assume all GC rally cars run a R180 4.11 diff? odd- as ive not heard of such a combination.
We are talking R160 for the GC8 in Aus
__________________
Speak to Shane @ SMC Tyres, Unit 6/385 Sevenoaks St Beckenham WA 6107. Mobile 0413 128 087. Tell him Maddog sent you!

Last edited by maddog; 09-07-2006 at 06:17 PM. Reason: delay in posting...added post refers to Aus spec GC8
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to maddog For This Useful Post:
Intra (20-08-2013)
  #13  
Old 09-07-2006, 06:03 PM
tuna's Avatar
Sign me up!
Why stop at two bar?
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Where horsepower is cool again.
Posts: 5,570
Blog Entries: 5
Thanks: 7
Thanked 107 Times in 50 Posts
tuna is a gurutuna is a guru
Default

yes, R160 arent the strongest- understood and agreed!

yes, the taller the ratio, the less rotation of the prop shaft and the less heat generated in the diff because of the increased contact time.

though, upgrade to a R180 and i think the reliability issues are back on your side, regardless of the ratio.
__________________

Long live the WRC

Last edited by tuna; 09-07-2006 at 06:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-07-2006, 11:36 AM
Denver's Avatar
Sir AntiLag
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Perth
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Denver at standard level
Default

Actually morgan, IMHO, the 4.44 diff will have more teeth in contact than a 3.9/4.11 diff..

bear in mind, to get a ratio of 4.44 it will have MORE teeth, than a 3.9/4.11 diff, now, the flip side to that is this..

the teeth will be smaller in thickness and possibly face area, marginally, however..

given that the teeth will be smaller, it is HIGHLY likely, that instead of having 1.5 teeth in contact at any given time like a 3.9/4.11 diff, it will have 2 teeth in contact at any given time, meaning the load is spread accross a greater surface area, meaning that its actually highly probable that a 4.44 diff is actually stronger than either of the other ratios..

now the only way to truly check this is out, is to one of each diff, check how many teeth there are in contact at any given time, but im willing to bet that the 4.44 will win ahnds down for pinion to crown face time..
__________________
Jesus Built my car, Its a love affair, Mainly Jesus and my hotrod
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-07-2006, 06:16 PM
jedi_luke's Avatar
STI Master
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: anything to save a $
Posts: 675
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
jedi_luke at standard level
Default

Ummmmmmmmmmmmm...... cool! , you guys have givin me ALOT to think about

all i know is that i had to pick from a 4.11 or a 4.44 .. i chose the 4.44 as i was told it would be better for a track and stronger but i will lose top end speed.
__________________
may the forced induction be with you
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-07-2006, 06:31 PM
pmh's Avatar
pmh pmh is offline
Sign me up!
Barge Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 2,116
Thanks: 2
Thanked 34 Times in 24 Posts
pmh at standard level
Default

Had the 4.44 RA box in the previous ride. It was great on the track. First time i had it on the road, with the traffic moving at a snail's pace, it was an experience.

You learn to take off from stand still from 2nd very quickly.

I loved it for the track, it was great. A few quick changes and you're already at your target speed and boost was always quick to get to and keep at.

Missus hated it for the daily driving for the reasons mentioned above
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-07-2006, 07:48 PM
jedi_luke's Avatar
STI Master
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: anything to save a $
Posts: 675
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
jedi_luke at standard level
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pmh
Had the 4.44 RA box in the previous ride. It was great on the track. First time i had it on the road, with the traffic moving at a snail's pace, it was an experience.

You learn to take off from stand still from 2nd very quickly.

I loved it for the track, it was great. A few quick changes and you're already at your target speed and boost was always quick to get to and keep at.

Missus hated it for the daily driving for the reasons mentioned above

should be fun when im driving it to work and back , peak hour: Darch (kingsley) to town
__________________
may the forced induction be with you
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 14-07-2006, 09:22 PM
maddog's Avatar
STI Master
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 771
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
maddog at standard level
Default

The 4.44 pinion is MUCH smaller that the others and obviously with more teeth. The 4.44 Crown is just slightly larger with...you guessed it, more teeth than its lower ratio counterpart. Given these extra teeth the base of each 4.44 gear is narrower compared to its lower ratio brothers. This significantly reduces the gears strength.
Hence the GC8 R160 4.44 diffs are much weaker than the 4.11 or 3.54 diffs.
__________________
Speak to Shane @ SMC Tyres, Unit 6/385 Sevenoaks St Beckenham WA 6107. Mobile 0413 128 087. Tell him Maddog sent you!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 15-07-2006, 09:16 PM
wrx4.11
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

my advice is not to even bother with the 4.44. my reason being the wont stand the test of time ive blown up my 3.9 standard box, then the 4.44 which was running an sti clutch and now ive got the 4.11 which ive had in the car the longest of all 3 boxes ive had.

it all depends on what u want and what ur willing to spend. if it gona b a dialy driver or u want a good balance between acceleration and topend power the 4.11 is awsome.

my 4.11 box in 5th gear at 7000rpms clocks out at 225 km/hr if u wanna go ne faster than that put a set of dog gears in the 3.9 box.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 15-07-2006, 09:20 PM
Clint's Avatar
Bent
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: ....
Posts: 1,087
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Clint at standard level
Default

PS wtf is 4.44 ? AFAIK its 4.444
__________________
[DBR]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
444, box, gear, sti


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Welcome to Perth-WRX, click here to register!

All times are GMT +8. The time now is 12:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO