View Single Post
  #22  
Old 28-01-2007, 10:18 PM
DAN682's Avatar
DAN682 DAN682 is offline
Sign me up!
Nazi Sled Driver
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mandurah
Posts: 2,364
Thanks: 25
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
DAN682 at standard level
Send a message via ICQ to DAN682 Send a message via MSN to DAN682 Send a message via Yahoo to DAN682
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by methd
hey dan

yes, a larger aperture of f/2.8 and bigger will allow you take photos when there's a lot less light. You can always use a flash for portraits but there's no way of lighting up the landscape with a flash so a really fast lens or a tripod is required.

if you're getting a zoom lens, just make sure it's f/2.8 for entire focal length zoom as some cheaper lenses are at 2.8 on only some focal lengths and not others.

large apertures are also handy for more background blur as well as desirable for fast shots (tennis etc) when u need a really fast shutter speed - and corresponding [large] aperture.

here's a picture i took with no flash. i jacked up the iso to 1600 and maxed out aperture and shutter to 1/30 (point at which it might start blurring if i go any slower). using a flash would destroy the atmosphere and mood of the photo, so a non-flash shot is essential.

Dang! That is some awesome photography!

Thanks for the advice Hien.. Much appreciated. I will be doing some duty free shopping in the next couple of weeks so I will check out the 2.8 lenses.

Have you dabbled in spotlighting yet?

I saw this affect on one of the photography forums... Pitch black room and pointed a torch at the subject.. Totally cool!

Reply With Quote