Quote:
Originally Posted by GTB Liberty
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caveat_emptor
Under the doctrine of caveat emptor, the buyer could not recover from the seller for defects on the property that rendered the property unfit for ordinary purposes. The only exception was if the seller actively concealed latent defects or otherwise made material misrepresentations amounting to fraud
|
lets not forget this is a general definition and not specifically Australian law.
but it is pretty close. If they advertised it I would try and bluff a refund based on the fact it was falsely advertised.....worth a shot....