View Single Post
  #2745  
Old 14-05-2010, 05:36 PM
trainwrex's Avatar
trainwrex trainwrex is offline
Sign me up!
Perth WRX Old Skool Cool Dude
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NOR
Posts: 6,685
Thanks: 2
Thanked 15 Times in 9 Posts
trainwrex at standard level
Default

Okay here are the graphs:

As you can see making a shit load of torque 713 nm atw.. But the biggest difference is the comparison between the old race fuel setup compared to the new one, The only difference being different heads, low mount twin scroll setup and 4" exhaust.

Massive improvements. So much more torque being generated much sooner in the rev range and lasting alot longer. Really way to much power for this car, the thing just pops out the rear without too much fuss. Barbagello raceway is going to be a handful at the veru minimum.. hahaha

Only running 1.8 bar boost with this setup, Sean says that the tune is very happy at this level and didnt want to start hurting the setup. Could easily smash 2.5 bar but there is really no point, at this power level should be well into the 10s no need to get another 50whp..

The dyno run was without its normal Tino dramas. Had syncing problems again, replaced the cam sensor (300 bux), then the 3 port MAC solinoid shat itself (120). But in the end after all the dramas the car feels very solid and we did around 10 full runs on the way to the big number, so handled it very well and feels very strong..

The car will be getting tuned next week on E85 and run at barbagellos next saturday for a bit of fun. 1/4 mile strip will also be happening soon..

On with the graphs:

Power vs Torque



Power vs Manifold pressure



Power vs Air fuel ratio



New VP109 tune (low mount turbo difference/heads) vs Old VP109 tune Power vs Torque



New VP109 tune (low mount turbo difference/heads) vs Old VP109 tune Power vs Manifold pressure

__________________
I'm a jockey kunts...
Reply With Quote