View Single Post
  #18  
Old 24-06-2011, 02:36 PM
gslrallysport's Avatar
gslrallysport gslrallysport is offline
Vendor
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 333
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
gslrallysport at standard level
Default

Yep, I appreciate that, and you're right in everything you've said just then, and I didn't overlook it, but I'm assuming most people fall under one of these two categories:
- Either they're building an FIA compliant cage, which doesn't have that provision. It's black and white in saying no alloyed metals, with no BS we'll-crumble-under-pressure-when-begged-to disclaimer like what CAMS have done with that provision you've quoted.
- Don't want to spend thousands of dollars going through the certification process...

If someone wants to build a non-FIA compliant cage, and go to the expense of getting CAMS to approve a 4130 cage, then they must be nuts.

I'm know the FIA is still homologating cages with T45 due to it's reduced requirement for localized heat treatment after welding (pretty sure most WRC and R2/3 cars run T45 now), but I'm almost 100% sure (though don't quote me) that they won't certify 4130 anymore, due to the known problems with cracking when not properly heat treated post welding. If CAMS in their infinite wisdom want to continue to approve 4130 against the FIA regs which they basically copied in the first, then that's their prerogative, but I'll personally never get in a car with a 4130 cage having seen the catastrophic failures that can occur with them...
__________________
- GSL RallySport - 1300 884 836 -www.gslrallysport.com -
Reply With Quote