tony of Perth Posted at 9:26 AM Today
there's internet crews who`s whole intention is to break these laws in perth, like on antilag. maybe if you chase those offenders you`l stop part of the problem instead of letting them openly break the law.
Comment 27 of 27

I guess having an Antilag banner will be an instant confiscation due to distress caused ... Well if Tony of Perth has its way.

These type of laws have already been deemed unconstitutional in South Australia.

SA Police stopped from selling, crushing cars after Supreme Court anti-hoon laws decision | News.com.au

>> What the Chief Justice says is wrong with the law:
* Courts must order forfeiture whenever a prosecutor asks.

* Courts have no discretion to say no, nor to vary the terms of the forfeit.

* Courts must order forfeiture even if it interferes with, or adds to, an offender's existing penalty.

* Forfeiture is often the most substantial part of the penalty.

* Prosecutors, not the courts, control how severe that punishment is because they get to pick which car is forfeited.

* An application for forfeiture amounts to the government ordering the court to do something.

* The applications force the court to act politically.

* Prosecutors can seek forfeiture retrospectively, forcing the courts to punish people months after their offence was committed.

__________________
[COLOR=Black]Liberty GT Spec B tuned 240 HP & 372 Nm at the hubs.[/COLOR] "Instead of banning high performance cars - ban low performance drivers"