Quote:
Originally Posted by JDM_STYLE
However you still bought something that was clearly a re-branded pad
and had no problem with it at the time, and were fully aware they were
as such.
If it was in a HC+ box and the re-branded pads were inside then you'd actually
have a case for full refund etc but since it wasn't you might just have to take
it on the chin as a mistake and move on.
|
I dont think you understand, we were lead to believe, and not being experts in pmu's range and international manufacturing specification for the last 10 years, relied upon Mao's vastly more experience in the matter to confirm and instil confidence that although looking not the part they were in fact exactly what we ordered.
In no way were we "fully aware that they were re-branded and different in compound or decade of manufacture at the time of purchase"
Rebranded - yes
10 years old, differing in compound and only for sale in SEA - no
If they were the same pad but purple that would be fine, but they arent are they Mao?
EDIT:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDM_STYLE
Where's the proof that is actually what PMU Japan said, the AUS supplier had already gotten it wrong once and they are supposed to know everything about their products ADM or JDM...
|
Fair point, however we have Mao's supplier SPK whose very sole interest is to validate the pads as genuine against a somewhat more legitimate source of pmu aus and Japan to which we trust they have not be colluding or acting unreasonably (like we have to do with Mao and SPK). They confirm that they are legitimate, just different from what we ordered and very old.