Perth-WRX.com  

Go Back   Perth-WRX.com > Technical > Mechanicals
Register Diddy Kart ArticlesAll AlbumsBlogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Welcome to Perth-WRX, click here to register!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23-02-2006, 06:56 PM
trainwrex's Avatar
Sign me up!
Perth WRX Old Skool Cool Dude
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NOR
Posts: 6,685
Thanks: 2
Thanked 15 Times in 9 Posts
trainwrex at standard level
Default Which is better bigger displacement or bigger cams

Hey guys,

Looking into my 2.5ltr rebuild and hoping that u guys could offer some assistance in my build process. The aim of the question is to find out which one of these mods i.e

1) Boring out the 2.5ltr block to 2.65ltr.
2) or fitting bigger cams to ported heads.

would reduce the spool up of a GT35R (A/R 0.82) and thus give better off boost response and power..

I only want to be able to rev each engine to a max of 8000rpm

advantages and disadvantages of either option
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-02-2006, 08:04 PM
LegacyGT's Avatar
STI Master
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: VicPark
Posts: 669
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
LegacyGT at standard level
Default

as the saying goes... there is no replacement for displacement (unless ur name is stacey)
__________________
deaded
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-02-2006, 08:15 PM
STi Tuned's Avatar
STI Master
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Westside
Posts: 583
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
STi Tuned at standard level
Default

Option one would be a hell of a lot cheaper if thats a factor.
__________________
Ho's gotta eat too
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-02-2006, 08:36 PM
STI-257's Avatar
WRX Hi Five Club
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: w>a
Posts: 285
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
STI-257 at standard level
Default trainrex

Go For Cams and heads You already have decent capacity
__________________
11.1@125mph
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-02-2006, 11:39 PM
Denver's Avatar
Sir AntiLag
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Perth
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Denver at standard level
Default

downside to going massive cams is that you tent to move the point where power actually kicks in up int he RPM range, trick is not to go too large on the cam profile otherwise they become ineffective before rpm point X..

eg in the rb26, i was considering 272 cams, but they only really egtw orking at about 5k rpm, so really you limiting your power band down a bit, where as 264's, bring in turb nice and early, and i have a really wide useable power band..

food for thought, bigger isn't always better...

as for going bigger displacement, porivded they can show the block will hold together <doubtful> you'e be better of going a rebuilt with forged slugs, good rods, balance and blueprint the crank, and looking at a cam profile that suits your turbo choice...
__________________
Jesus Built my car, Its a love affair, Mainly Jesus and my hotrod
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24-02-2006, 07:17 AM
Scoobie Noobie
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: uranus
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
henry at standard level
Default

i was advised to dump my version 3 cams on my 2.35 as they would no be as efficient on a larger motor, hence i source some cams from Ivan Tighe that will bring a larger turbo on quicker with more mid range, plus a head job to further assist air flow, anyway thats the theory...........time will tell.....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24-02-2006, 09:02 AM
trainwrex's Avatar
Sign me up!
Perth WRX Old Skool Cool Dude
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NOR
Posts: 6,685
Thanks: 2
Thanked 15 Times in 9 Posts
trainwrex at standard level
Default

thanks for the responses guys.. i am total aggreement with u denver that the cam profile needs to suit the turbo..

And in reality the extra displacement over the 2.5 would prolly only bring the rpm down maybe 1-200rpm. Thus cams would be a better option..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 24-02-2006, 09:47 AM
EXPLICIT's Avatar
www.dilettante.net
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: certified a**hole!!!
Posts: 4,244
Thanks: 5
Thanked 24 Times in 14 Posts
EXPLICIT at standard level
Send a message via MSN to EXPLICIT
Default

Mild cams, head job, 2.5L and she'll be sweet mate.
__________________
www.racewars.com.au
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25-02-2006, 12:55 AM
Red MY01
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What about extending the stroke? is that an option?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
bigger, cams, displacement


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Welcome to Perth-WRX, click here to register!

All times are GMT +8. The time now is 03:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO