View Single Post
  #18  
Old 26-08-2009, 09:14 PM
trainwrex's Avatar
trainwrex trainwrex is offline
Sign me up!
Perth WRX Old Skool Cool Dude
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NOR
Posts: 6,685
Thanks: 2
Thanked 15 Times in 9 Posts
trainwrex at standard level
Default

This is the info i got back from Jeff the developer..

"
I modeled mine after the OEM system in terms of functionality, with a little more flexibility for swaps.
You don't need to have functioning abs and the maps are a bit more active and refined than the OEM system. "

I asked what he thought of neetronics

"
I wouldn't say the Neetronics is better in terms of maps. Their units only tie to the tps, brakes and they have no g-sensor. So they are mapped with a much different approach.

Their system is based on lookup tables. This in my opinion is pretty antiquated, my system uses much more complex mathematics to arrive at more smooth output settings.

My system scales across all rates based on the setting of one knob, as you turn the knob it changes the scaling of all the programs for acceleration, braking and turning.

Their system cannot do things like measuring cornering force and decreasing lock for corner entry and increasing the lock quickly after the apex."


I think im just going to go with the DCCDpro as i dont have the OEM ecu
__________________
I'm a jockey kunts...
Reply With Quote