View Single Post
  #36  
Old 23-04-2010, 10:47 PM
Rossco's Avatar
Rossco Rossco is offline
Perth WRX Old Skool Cool Dude
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perf, NOR
Posts: 5,467
Blog Entries: 11
Thanks: 54
Thanked 100 Times in 79 Posts
Rossco is a guruRossco is a guru
Send a message via MSN to Rossco
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trblmkr View Post

As for basic intake mods, as long as the MAF is reading the correct volume of air entering the engine and the fuel system can keep up, wont the standard ecu keep AFR's in check?
In a word NO the stock ecu can't keep the afr's in check.

The ecu is programmed to use the maf signal output as the load reference for the fuel map. Changing the volume of the air column before the sensor and you run into issues where the ecu will swing lean or rich due to either laminar flow in the piping (why long CAI's cause lean out) or turbulent flow past the sensor (why pods mounted to the maf cause slightly richer afr's).

The above is why a MAP sensor is the better way of getting a load reference, MAF's can be fooled - MAP's can't.

The only other feedback the stock ecu has is the narrowband oxygen sensor which is only used for cruise mixture trimming for emission control & economy.
__________________
[CENTER][SIGPIC][/SIGPIC][/CENTER]
[CENTER][COLOR=#ff0000]Built Ej207: Semi-closed RA Cases - Wiseco Forgies - Manley rods - BC 272 cams - GDA Heads - billet f/whl - Vi-pec - WbO2 - 800cc Yellow tops - TD05-20G - 409Hp ath @ 1.75bar on E85[/COLOR][/CENTER]

Last edited by Rossco; 24-04-2010 at 08:28 AM.
Reply With Quote