id say thats exactly why teejay.. just saying that the 2.5 has more useable powerband for daily than the evo did.. the evo had more top end power but it had to be over 4k rpm to be fun, it was sluggish off boost.. downright lame actually
|
I dont agree, especially if it had exhaust and tune.
Ive driven/belted, Evo wise 6, 6.5, 7 GSR, 7 RS, 7 GTA, 8 ADM, 8 JDM, 8 MR, 9, X They basically never ever feel lame, the same things that make them annoying day to day is what give them character. |
[QUOTE=drewgong;658832]the evo had more top end power but it had to be over 4k rpm to be fun, it was sluggish off boost.. downright lame actually[/QUOTE]
What? Must have been a NA Lancer with an Evo sticker. |
yuuurrrr evo sticker bro.. been said already dumbass. Next moron..
|
Depends on what you want to use the car for and what appeals to you the most
I made this choice about 5 years ago and went with the 8MR. Sure the sti had more creatures comforts etc and there is no getting away from that boxer note! But in the end I knew the car wouldnt be used as a daily driver and at the time and there werent many Evo's around at the either. Plus after after test driving both I personally preferred the Evo. |
Fark yours is an MR? Thought it was a normal one when i was talking to you @ Midvale....nice!
|
[QUOTE=drewgong;658958]yuuurrrr evo sticker bro.. been said already dumbass. Next moron..[/QUOTE]
Enough with the idiotic comments from you and from other members to you. I cbf with it anymore, so any members calling other members names like it is some schoolyard, will get a holiday. |
I have driven a 9 and a X.
Anything but lame. Power was instant smooth all the way to the redline. |
buy my evo 8
|
Who comments about off boost performance? bahahhahahaha
|
All times are GMT +8. The time now is 05:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO