Originally Posted by fobz

I want to know at what point will pictures and video become inadmissible in court
due to tampering ?

With the quality of GCI and most camera's now being digital, I am sure it would
not be very hard to photo-chop a pic of the premiers car with smoke puring off
its wheels in kings park. Now will that stand up in court ? How do you prove
a digital image has not been altered ? or completely fake ?

If you EVER get told they have a pic, NEVER admit anything. Force them to prove
it in court. Require proof that the picture has not been altered in any way.
Introduce reasonable doubt about the authenticity of the video/image, and that
the device it came from is not considered secure and could have been tampered
with before it was handed to police.