Perth-WRX.com  

Go Back   Perth-WRX.com > Technical > Mechanicals
Register Diddy Kart ArticlesAll AlbumsBlogs FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Welcome to Perth-WRX, click here to register!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 21-05-2010, 03:05 PM
tuna's Avatar
Sign me up!
Why stop at two bar?
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Where horsepower is cool again.
Posts: 5,570
Blog Entries: 5
Thanks: 7
Thanked 107 Times in 50 Posts
tuna is a gurutuna is a guru
Default

grrr "full boost"

please explain.
__________________

Long live the WRC
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 21-05-2010, 03:18 PM
DCCD Donut Driver
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bicton
Posts: 76
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
silvascoob at standard level
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tuna View Post
grrr "full boost"

please explain.
18.5psi of positive manifold pressure at 3500 revolutions of the crankshaft per minute.
I should have been more specific, the statment should have read "target boost level was achieved at 3500rpm"
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 21-05-2010, 03:42 PM
Perth WRX Old Skool Cool Dude
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 6,766
Blog Entries: 6
Thanks: 31
Thanked 48 Times in 34 Posts
BALISTC knows their stuff
Default

Smart arse.. "full boost at x rpm" is useless unless we know what your full boost level is.

If your full boost level is 3psi, then full boost @ 3500rpm is crap.

25 psi by 3500rpm on the other hand, is excellent.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 21-05-2010, 04:15 PM
BLUES's Avatar
Flat Four Father
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Pokerstars.com, FullTiltPoker.com
Posts: 2,180
Thanks: 2
Thanked 34 Times in 30 Posts
BLUES at standard level
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BALISTC View Post
I had a 207 die on me, first time it copped full boost on the dyno after run-in. Suspected factory error but the way the failure was means we couldn't prove or disprove it 100%, so I just had to suck it up and start again.
What failed Joe?
__________________
MY09 Evo X - 1.6bar@3500rpm - got lag?
Barbagallo - 56.03 (S); 1:08.09 (L)
Collie - 50.77
Possibly the most under-driven Evo X in the world??
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 21-05-2010, 04:40 PM
teejay's Avatar
Perth WRX Old Skool Cool Dude
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Burnout Central
Posts: 8,718
Thanks: 102
Thanked 189 Times in 152 Posts
teejay is a guruteejay is a guruteejay is a guru
Send a message via MSN to teejay
Default

I thought the injectors washed the bores down because of the spray pattern?





or something about large injectors lots of fuel and never seeing boost
__________________
I am only an asshole on the internet :)

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 21-05-2010, 06:40 PM
DCCD Donut Driver
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bicton
Posts: 76
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
silvascoob at standard level
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BALISTC View Post
Smart arse.. "full boost at x rpm" is useless unless we know what your full boost level is.

If your full boost level is 3psi, then full boost @ 3500rpm is crap.

25 psi by 3500rpm on the other hand, is excellent.
hahaha i'm just trying to provide some stimulating discussion. Seems P-diddy has been lacking this as of late.....

Anyway back on topic and repeating what everyone else has said.
2.5's are great fun and easy to drive with some mild mod's.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 21-05-2010, 06:55 PM
XT43's Avatar
Flat Four Father
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Perthzeds wallet
Posts: 2,984
Thanks: 7
Thanked 166 Times in 125 Posts
XT43 is a guruXT43 is a guruXT43 is a guru
Default

Ok, let's use JMEs car as a measuring stick.
56.00s around Barbs and will shave some more off with the upcoming handling mods with his 207 packing 220ish kw and 430odd Nm
If he whacked in a 2.5 with the same power / torque outputs is he going to be able to produce the same result?
__________________
Fuck your signature
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 21-05-2010, 07:08 PM
Perth WRX Old Skool Cool Dude
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: neveryoumind
Posts: 3,071
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Elrico at standard level
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jEstEr? View Post
You've got to wonder Eric, thats a few that have gone by by. Did the japs do something wrong for a month?
Im pretty sure between Joe, Benny and Myself its more like a year+. Still out of pocket 11k.....makes me wonder if ill ever go subaru again .

Would you get the same torque outputs from an extra 500cc? Id expect you would gain a little more, plus the ability to spool the turbo earlier from the extra displacement which would make it great out of the 1st and 2nd turns (at barbs). Spose opinions are like arseholes, everyones got one.

Last edited by Elrico; 21-05-2010 at 07:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 21-05-2010, 08:18 PM
Hurtenstein's Avatar
Subaru Tech Division
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: C to tha V
Posts: 1,745
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Hurtenstein at standard level
Default

If the difference between 2.0 and 2.5 were that little, i wouldnt have blinked at putting the 2.0 back in....
__________________
Balls.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 21-05-2010, 08:33 PM
EXPLICIT's Avatar
www.dilettante.net
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: certified a**hole!!!
Posts: 4,244
Thanks: 5
Thanked 24 Times in 14 Posts
EXPLICIT at standard level
Send a message via MSN to EXPLICIT
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XT43 View Post
Ok, let's use JMEs car as a measuring stick.
56.00s around Barbs and will shave some more off with the upcoming handling mods with his 207 packing 220ish kw and 430odd Nm
If he whacked in a 2.5 with the same power / torque outputs is he going to be able to produce the same result?
I believe there'd be nothing in it really Burke, the delivery would be different but outcome would be the same. But 5+ hot full bore laps in a 2.5 @ 24psi.......................I'd still rather the 2.0L. I also prefer the urgency of the twinscroll setup and flexability of a more extreme rev range.
__________________
www.racewars.com.au
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
207, 257, my99


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Liberty Engine Cover for MY99 - What year Liberty and 2.0L or 2.5L fits MY99?? DEDLYWEPN Cosmetic 11 27-02-2007 07:54 PM
Jun My99 Wrx DarkMoose For Sale 2 27-10-2006 02:34 AM
FS: Turbosmart MY99 BOV adapter& MY99 TMIC. GTLeggy For Sale 0 10-03-2006 04:02 PM
Fs: My99 Wrx D1josh For Sale 0 12-10-2005 01:03 PM



Welcome to Perth-WRX, click here to register!

All times are GMT +8. The time now is 05:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO