|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
I bought a my body and a couple of lenses from here . Super fast shipping, order today, receive tomorrow. I believe they can do these because they have stock over in the eastern states. DWI and Citiwide online have pretty good deals as well every now and then, what might be an additional plus is that they can under declare the value of goods so you don't pay GST, this will affect your delivery insurance however as they will only cover what's stated in the invoice.
The kit lens looks pretty good covering 15-300mm over 2 lenses and I reckon that's a good start if you're not shooting sports or in low light. Once the optical zoom ratio gets too high, barrel distortion, chromatic aberration and striction? (where the barrel moves about due to the weight) becomes a larger issue. I have a 18-200 and noticed the above. Having said that, for general walkaround/travelling lens, the 18-200 would be the ideal lens. Getting slightly lower quality shots is better than not taking a shot at all Chuck in a 50mm f1.8 (these things go for 150) or even 1.4G and you can take on any low light situation with an accompanying hotshoe flash. Perhaps you can also consider the 28-300 as well? Its the FX version of the 18-200. I currently use a Sigma 24-70 f2.8 HSM and I reckon they are pretty good in terms of value. Pretty soft wide open however but half the price of a nikon copy. Perhaps you might want to set aside a bit of cash for a set of filters as well. A good set of UV and CPL/ND filters can do wonders to your final shot. |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
I recently received my 70-200mm lens as pictured in the earlier pages and love it.
Now, I need an idea on which smaller lens now to compliment it. What you think out of these ones? Which would best go with it on a D7000. $1254 $1566 Or should I be looking at just getting a fixed mm lens with a lower f stop? I always thought it was better to have a lens that could zoom in and out a little instead of having a fixed lens? Can someone explain that as I am still new at this.............. but I'm getting there. Cheers.
__________________
Respect Mya Authoritaaaaaa!!! |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Based on focal length alone I would go for the 24-70mm Nikkor, that should give you damn good image quality and would cover you for pretty much everything that your new lens is too long for.
Primes (fixed mm as you put it) are fantastic in terms of sharpness and depth of field, but will limit you in certain situations. If you're still pretty new to it all I doubt very much that you'll notice the quality difference between a prime and a zoom, so I would go for the zoom for flexibility
__________________
Ryan |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
24-70
__________________
Signarape! |
Tags |
outsort, starting |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What sort of alarm do I have? | SyncSubaru | General Subaru Discussion | 5 | 16-02-2011 01:02 PM |
Im back...sort of. :) | REXZIBIT | Introductions | 45 | 01-05-2009 01:13 PM |
Opinion: Occasional Starting Problem | klass8wrx | Mechanicals | 25 | 15-06-2007 11:18 AM |
Starting problems | vertecal | Mechanicals | 9 | 11-10-2006 06:34 PM |
starting mods | gumby | General Subaru Discussion | 13 | 12-09-2006 10:38 AM |