|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
He'll lose. Done.
__________________
Respect Mya Authoritaaaaaa!!! |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Didn't a few people over east successfully contest fines that were issued by hand held lasers due to the calibration being incorrect?
__________________
221.7KW-ATW 498.5NM MMS ROLLER DYNO & BUILT BY STi NINJAS, BUILD #318/600 EBISU SUBARU, SHIBUYA-KU TOKYO |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Under the freedom of information act it is possible to obtain any & all information relating to the specific hand held laser/multanova/dash mounted radar that is being used as the tool to convict you, including it's recent testing schedule and testing/calibration/operational requirements, if they have failed to have the unit tested/calibrated/set up properly in the right conditions for operation as required, it is possible to have the charges overturned.
There is a female police officer over east who was charged with speeding at 108kph in a 100 zone by a permanent mounted speed camera..IN HER MARKED PATROL CAR..she is currently taking this case to court maintaining she was driving on cruise control set to below 100kph, after having the cars speedometer laser tested, the in car monitoring/recording devices put forward as evidence, and the testimony of her partner in the vehicle at the time that she was definitely not speeding, and that the camera in question was known to be, and had a history of being, faulty, yet was still issuing fines as a result of it's readings purely for revenue purposes in the hope that the majority of motorists will just pay the fine and not bother going to the effort of contesting it in court - as the readings were below what was required to incur demerit points, but inaccurate enough to implicate motorists only slightly above the limit to be fined a monetary fine. Both these cases have the potential to shake the system in regards to the fact the cameras are used purely for revenue raising, as well as being quite unreliable and inaccurate if not used within their optimal operating parameters, and have no impact on reducing the road toll. It is not about giving retards who blatantly & recklessly speed on the roads an easy out from fine and/or conviction, but keeping the concept of using the cameras as tools to slow cars down in known fatality areas (mostly country roads according to statistics) rather than them being put in areas where the majority of motorists might strsy a few kph's over the limit (ie halfway down hills) where there is no immediate risk to life or limb of any party involved.
__________________
God gave us feet...so we could work the pedals properly That wasn't a U-turn! It was two consecutive right hand turns. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
None of these detection devices are exempt from this Act. (From Aussie Speeding Fines newsletter)
__________________
(2009 Hail write-off) 2010 Hatch 267 hp & 425nm ASG Dyno. |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Have you met him?
I hope he loses, Ive never met a cop who is hated by fellow workers as much as this idiot. There are many within the force that know him and are rather excited about the fact.
__________________
Old Dog |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
yeah, I compete against him...he's abit of a tool! Hope they throw the book at him
__________________
Wand basics: One must brake with the left hand and steer with the right foot. Having Defi's does not make Racecar.. |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Nice theory though.
__________________
Family Wagon - MY09 Forester XT - Magnaflow Mufflers, Whiteline RSB, 20% Tint, Verso tuned to 199.1HP and 333.9Nm. Daily Driver - 2008 VW MKV R32 - EVOMS Intake + much more planned!!! |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Old Dog |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Guys,
I think you should be mindful of what you say in an open online forum. This forum is not a discussion around a BBQ with a few beers, anyone, anywhere in the world can read it. I'm not able to comment on this case, however like all situations, there are two sides to a story. I'd imagine that most of you are are basing your opinions on what you have heard & read in the media. Regardless of what you think, you may be surprised by the other side of the story. For some reason, society seems to have forgotten how the law works: Innocent until PROVEN guilty. It seems that trial by media is very popular and once accused, you're guilty even before you set foot in the court room. Everyone is entitled to a day in court (even for speeding fines). If you are alledged to have broken the law and you don't think it is correct, you have the legal right to go to court and contest it. It may be worth waiting for the verdict before passing judgement? Karl
__________________
[B][COLOR=navy][B][COLOR=navy]Rally Driving Perth[/COLOR][/B][/COLOR][/B][COLOR=navy] [/COLOR][COLOR=blue]www.rallyaction.com.au[/COLOR] [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] [COLOR=navy]Rally Action Driver Training[/COLOR] |
Tags |
i dare you to sue me, likes, officer, perth, police, ralli, speeding |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stupid shit you've been fined for by Police for! | JA50N | General Subaru Discussion | 100 | 05-08-2008 07:51 PM |
Fuel Pump for Verso Tune | gumby | General Subaru Discussion | 32 | 25-04-2007 04:01 PM |
police harrassment | creepin | General Subaru Discussion | 163 | 21-09-2006 08:17 PM |
WTF?? 2 teenage perth girls murder friend | EvilCabbage | Non-WRX Discussion | 20 | 25-06-2006 09:02 PM |
Police rammed in Sydney tunnel chase | Subigrl | General Subaru Discussion | 20 | 20-06-2006 08:55 PM |