|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
On another note Gav; I WAS going to assemble my new shortie myself, but I've been offered a deal I can't refuse on all machining, clearencing, modification & short block assembly for <$1k
This will save me time & the possibility of me making a dumb mistake. My bottom end is then apparently good for 450+ hp at the crank......100 hp plus over my target.
__________________
[CENTER][SIGPIC][/SIGPIC][/CENTER] [CENTER][COLOR=#ff0000]Built Ej207: Semi-closed RA Cases - Wiseco Forgies - Manley rods - BC 272 cams - GDA Heads - billet f/whl - Vi-pec - WbO2 - 800cc Yellow tops - TD05-20G - 409Hp ath @ 1.75bar on E85[/COLOR][/CENTER] |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
2.1 - 2.5 fails.... well... in my case anyway haha
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
I think Rossco hit the nail on the head, I need to work out my power goals and go from there, plus the fact that the 2.5 needs more $$ to get the reliability...
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Failure rate, also interested in what are factors are making you lean towards the 2.5.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
I guess it is the street driveability and extra torque, however I am aware that the more you push them the more often they fail...
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
2.5 can be built tough and be able to rev and make good power as well, can all ways go a 2.35, those extra cubes give the torque to be able to pull us fat sods arounds.....
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Gav.
Speak to tony knight.. Guru in my book, let him know ur goals and hell make u a ripper engine..
__________________
I'm a jockey kunts... |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
there should be very little difference in the "rev-ability" of 2.5 and 2.1 litre bottom ends.
they both have the same stroke(79mm/2.5 crank) and rod ratio (unless you are building something out of the ordinary with custom length rods and pistons with altered pin height to suit). cam and turbo selection would cause a greater variance on "rev-ability" than the bore size difference.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Can i ask what happened to the current engine? Why not just keep it going untill it dies? Strap a bigger turbo on and enjoy.
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I guess the 2.1 would be a stronger set up. cheers |
Tags |
advice, build, engine, requested, so many arrogant cunts. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trainwrex Engine build back | trainwrex | General Subaru Discussion | 6287 | 27-03-2017 10:50 PM |
Opinions from those that know? engine build.... | Rossco | Mechanicals | 131 | 21-12-2012 09:01 PM |
New Engine Build Questions | Qu3xy | Mechanicals | 44 | 02-03-2009 07:34 PM |
USDM Recalled MY08 Forrester FXT and MY08 WRX STI | American Dave | General Subaru Discussion | 53 | 14-05-2008 06:23 PM |
Running Advice.. (treadmill, not an engine) | DAN682 | Non-WRX Discussion | 34 | 06-07-2006 04:32 PM |