|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Yip 180 on roller is a bargain for those mods.
BIG REX- got zorst, CAI, silicon itake at home ready to fit, just tossing up whether to go FMI and huffer and finalise the ECU decision. Want to do all at once to keep tuning costs down..... |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Which intake did you get Al?
Lane @ RT said he didn't want to tune the APS cai which i was looking at.
__________________
R34 GT-R Vspec II Nür - Black Pearl Stack that Cheese |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Al |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
The APS unit requires more calibration = more tuning time = more $, whereas the Hyperflow CAI doesn't, therefore is preferred.
__________________
MY09 Evo X - 1.6bar@3500rpm - got lag? Barbagallo - 56.03 (S); 1:08.09 (L) Collie - 50.77 Possibly the most under-driven Evo X in the world?? |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Freddy boy, does the hyperflow unit go into the guard?.
Will it really be anymore tuning if I am going FMI and huffer anyway, as AFRs etc will be all up the wop anyway? Al |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
yep.
As for tuning - i think it's more about re-calibrating the AFM to read the APS CAI flow properly, rather than tuning per say. The re-calibration part is time consuming apparently. Also, the APS CAI uses the same hole that many FMIC kits use for piping.
__________________
MY09 Evo X - 1.6bar@3500rpm - got lag? Barbagallo - 56.03 (S); 1:08.09 (L) Collie - 50.77 Possibly the most under-driven Evo X in the world?? |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Fred - Is there any difference between the hyperflow & MRT cai?
I'm looking to buy a new intake soon and get a retune..
__________________
R34 GT-R Vspec II Nür - Black Pearl Stack that Cheese |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
get angle mount love huy, it comes witha custom CAI
|
Tags |
my06, sti, turbo, upgrade |
|
|