Licence issues after DD - Page 5 - Perth-WRX.com

phizzle · #41 24-10-2008, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red_MY04

Ummm ok. Thanks.

"200hp + 78% = 356hp. Which is about what you have."

Ok if you want to break it down anf italic and bold shit

Quote:

Originally Posted by PIGSTI

Has more than 78% of a 200hp car thankyou.

Smile. It's Friday!!!

teejay · #42 24-10-2008, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red_MY04

78% is "only just" nowadays, fark!

Your car only just has more power than a 200 rwhp WRX then Jaron.

I love those hard c***s who roll with no front driveshafts or diff locks

FFOUR · #43 24-10-2008, 03:02 PM

EVL WRX · #44 24-10-2008, 03:05 PM

Miggidy · #45 24-10-2008, 03:11 PM

[QUOTE=nachjoe]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fozzy

However When you are drunk you are not in control its that simple. .089 is pissed its that simple.

QUOTE]

Fozzy excuse my french but ur a dick...089 is not drunk..even the cops and my lawyer have confirmed this. Its not classed as 'drunk' but is over the legal limit..fuk all the rest of u who think im a typical DD cos I dont agree with it and I am not..i got kids i see dickhead dd's do fked up shit all the time..know the storey b4 u shout ur mouth..I had 2 fking pints early hrs of the morning..was stopped at 2.30am no food in my gut just beer..this is why I blew over.

Thanks to thoes for the answers I was asking and yes I will double check with the DPI...fk some of u cunts just love to have a good ol' bitch on here

two pints... like 4 standard drinks... You are a fucking hero. I hope you never get insurance again.

perthzed · #46 24-10-2008, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jEstEr?

I think drink driving should be a hoon law, confiscation of vehicle, big fines and loss of lic etc. PerthZed you clearly have not been affected by a drunk driver in your life or i'm sure your tone would change

No I haven't. And at no point in my posts have I condoned DD. I acknowledged he broke the law, but he has been treated like some kind of pariah despite blowing over the limit by just 0.009. And I totally agree with you, hoon laws should apply to DD as well. But I don't think we need 0.05 and 0.08 rules. Make it one or the other. Because people know that if they blow between 0.05 and 0.08 they'll only receive a fine they push the envelope. If you lost your license with a 0.05 reading, a lot more drivers would not risk it.

FFOUR · #47 24-10-2008, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by perthzed

....but he has been treated like some kind of pariah despite blowing over the limit by just 0.009...

0.009 (0.039 actually) makes it sound insignificant coz we are dealing with very small numbers here, but if you look at as 78% over the limit as stated numerous times you can't argue that he is "just" over.

Miggidy · #48 24-10-2008, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red_MY04

0.009 (0.039 actually) makes it sound insignificant coz we are dealing with very small numbers here, but if you look at as 78% over the limit as stated numerous times you can't argue that he is "just" over.

Exactly

If he had an accident and somebody died. No insurance and jail. Try telling the judge you were just over...

perthzed · #49 24-10-2008, 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red_MY04

0.009 (0.039 actually) makes it sound insignificant coz we are dealing with very small numbers here, but if you look at as 78% over the limit as stated numerous times you can't argue that he is "just" over.

Well this goes back to my previous point about 0.08 being the 'actual' legal limit. The Govt has determined that 0.08 is the point that somebody is incapable of driving a car when intoxicated, NOT 0.05. If they had any evidence that suggested the license suspending limit should be 0.05 then it would be, end of story.

EVL WRX · #50 24-10-2008, 03:40 PM

The LEGAL limit is 0.05 before you are deemed to have broken the law and penalties are enforced.. 0.08 is the point at which the penalty is increased to loss of licence

not hard to understand really..